tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9463343.post4825246537476058753..comments2007-10-16T13:56:30.796-07:00Comments on scribble pad.: those "sassy" babesm.http://www.blogger.com/profile/04528436037850469448basicallyblah@gmail.comBlogger11125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9463343.post-79861937536348043102007-10-16T13:56:00.000-07:002007-10-16T13:56:00.000-07:00Agree with your comments. If you want ideas and i...Agree with your comments. If you want ideas and inspiration on celebrating women (no sexuality involved!) check out http://www.herestogoodwomen.comAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9463343.post-83004785180356655852007-07-03T06:26:00.000-07:002007-07-03T06:26:00.000-07:00very insightful! one would think that all articles...very insightful! one would think that all articles which feature pretty female pictures are more about the pictures than the article itself.<BR/><BR/>of all media stereotypes the sexy female stereotype is flaunted the most. i guess it indicates that the world is male dominated and sex starved.pankajhttps://pankajunk.wordpress.comnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9463343.post-1612526656465392372007-04-19T01:16:00.000-07:002007-04-19T01:16:00.000-07:00Using amerika ishtyle dates. So blunder was a day ...Using amerika ishtyle dates. So blunder was a day off. :D<BR/><BR/>Went and read P Sainath. He's really fighting, isn't he? Boy, he's trying hard. I really hope something comes of it.The Tobacconisthttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10912183908493366214noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9463343.post-64250534840198908352007-04-19T01:09:00.000-07:002007-04-19T01:09:00.000-07:00anon: ah! :))the tobacconist: cheap bum, you would...anon: ah! :))<BR/><BR/>the tobacconist: cheap bum, you would think that! <I>*considering*</I> not a bad idea though... :D and doofus, it be 7/6, not 7/7. pliss to let alone further references to subject until doo coursa time! :)m.http://www.blogger.com/profile/04528436037850469448noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9463343.post-49516398333038069822007-04-19T00:57:00.000-07:002007-04-19T00:57:00.000-07:00Such fraudness. I thought you had implemented some...Such fraudness. I thought you had implemented some blanket rule, of only honoring comments from those of us who'll be worth a gift or two come 7/7. :D<BR/><BR/>And here's a free tick off:<BR/><BR/>Wikipedia rocks! :)The Tobacconisthttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10912183908493366214noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9463343.post-9125415695877582552007-04-18T23:42:00.000-07:002007-04-18T23:42:00.000-07:00thats coz the earlier two issues had famous person...thats coz the earlier two issues had famous personalities so they can afford to be ugly... he he...<BR/><BR/>but this issue was about general gyan so obviously picked a model... kapish ? :PAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9463343.post-39150653280055182542007-04-17T10:46:00.000-07:002007-04-17T10:46:00.000-07:00the tobacconist: LOL... trust you, nice one! but p...the tobacconist: LOL... trust you, nice one! but pliss to not be putting wikipedia links here no?! i took the liberty of changing that to the *actual* Captain Morgan Rum page :D<BR/><BR/>bigfan: thanks muchly. oh boy. that's a whole field of work you're casually bringing up! :)) let's just say all hail <A HREF="http://www.screenonline.org.uk/people/id/566978/index.html" REL="nofollow">laura m.http://www.blogger.com/profile/04528436037850469448noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9463343.post-10968743473542478902007-04-17T10:41:00.000-07:002007-04-17T10:41:00.000-07:00the tobacconist: Or she might just like her Capt.M...the tobacconist: Or she might just like her <A HREF="http://landingpage2.captainmorgan.com/gateway-en-row.htm?BrandId=RUM&RefUrl=http%3a%2f%2fwww.captainmorgan.com%2fHomePage.htm" REL="nofollow">Capt.Morgan rum!</A> :D<BR/>(re-posted by m.)the tobacconisthttp://www2.blogger.com/profile/10912183908493366214noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9463343.post-12679683752131362232007-04-17T01:44:00.000-07:002007-04-17T01:44:00.000-07:00Well, you are perfectly right! Men however they lo...Well, you are perfectly right! Men however they look - fat or bald are accepeted material for the cover page. But, women necessarily have to be slim, sexy and be dressed in designer clothes. Esp when the article talks about women in the corporate world (and not participants of LIFW!) this was completely unwarranted..S - Currently a cynichttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00204039801766946849noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9463343.post-25984723056474707832007-04-17T01:17:00.000-07:002007-04-17T01:17:00.000-07:00Agreed with every single word in the post!Agreed with every single word in the post!Krishhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13353408480135207751noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9463343.post-32200872466182131712007-04-15T02:04:00.000-07:002007-04-15T02:04:00.000-07:00This is not very relevant to your post, but I was ...This is not very relevant to your post, but I was wondering if you could post, sometime, on why the focus in pornography is always the woman/women, and why in the movies it's always the women who're scantily clad. It's always puzzled me.BigFanOfYoursnoreply@blogger.com